Prevalencia de infección por COVID-19 por serología positiva (IgG/IgM) en personal médico de la cátedra y servicio de otorrinolaringología del Hospital de Clínicas / Prevalence of COVID-19 infection by positive serology (IgG/IgM) in medical personnel of the chair and service of otorhinolaryngology of the Hospital de Clínicas

Resumen Introducción: El personal de otorrinolaringología presenta una elevada exposición al virus SARS-CoV-2, debido a los procedimientos que lleva a cabo. Es fundamental tomar las medidas de protección adecuadas. Determinar la seroprevalencia nos dará un mejor panorama sobre la exposición, contagios y efectividad de medidas de protección adoptadas. Objetivo: Determinar la prevalencia de resultados serológicos positivos en personal médico que presta servicio en la Cátedra de Otorrinolaringología de marzo del 2020 a marzo de 2021. Material y Método: Estudio observacional, descriptivo, corte transversal, retrospectivo con asociación cruzada. Muestreo no probabilístico de casos consecutivos. La población total fue de 38 médicos del Servicio de Otorrinolaringología del Hospital de Clínicas. Resultados: La media de edades fue 37,4 años, 63,5% refirió haber atendido a paciente conocido portador de COVID-19. Un 42% refirió no haber cumplido con todas las medidas de protección personal, mientras que un 23,7% de los sujetos de estudio dio positivo para IgG, interpretándose como infección previa por COVID-19. Conclusión: Más de las dos terceras partes de los médicos refirió dar consulta a paciente COVID-19 positivo. Casi la cuarta parte de los médicos resultó ser positivo para COVID-19 según la prueba de serología anti-N. No se halló asociación entre consulta ni cirugía a pacientes portadores de COVID-19 y el contagio al personal médico.

Abstract Introduction: Otolaryngology personnel have a high exposure to SARS-CoV-2 virus due to the procedures they perform. It is essential to take appropriate protective measures. Determining seroprevalence will give us a better picture of exposure, contagion and effectiveness of protective measures adopted. Aim: To determine the prevalence of positive serological results in medical staff serving in the otolaryngology department from March 2020 to March 2021. Material and Method: Observational, descriptive, cross-sectional, retrospective, retrospective study with cross-association. Non-probability sampling of consecutive cases. The total population was 38 physicians of the Otolaryngology Service of the Hospital de Clinicas. Results: The mean age was 37.4. 63.5% reported having seen a patient known to be a COVID-19 carrier, while 42% reported not having complied with all personal protection measures. A 23.68% of the study subjects tested positive for IgG, interpreting previous COVID-19 infection. Conclusion: More than two-thirds of the physicians referred to giving consultation to COVID-19 positive patients. Almost a quarter of the physicians were positive for COVID-19 according to the Anti-N serology test. No association was found between consultation or surgery of patients with COVID-19 and infection of medical personnel.

Comparing plastic surgery and otolaryngology surgical outcomes and cartilage graft preferences in pediatric rhinoplasty: A retrospective cohort study analyzing 1839 patients.

ABSTRACT: Rhinoplasty in children has raised concerns about its safety in the pediatric population. There is scarcity of evidence describing outcomes and surgical techniques performed in pediatric rhinoplasty. We analyzed post-operative complications and cartilage preferences between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists.Data was collected through the Pediatric National Surgical Improvement Program from 2012 to 2017. Current Procedure Terminology codes were used for data extraction. Patients were grouped according to type of rhinoplasty procedures (primary, secondary, and cleft rhinoplasty). A comparison between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists was made in each group in terms of postoperative complications. Additionally, a sub-group analysis based on cartilage graft preferences was performed.During the study period, a total of 1839 patients underwent rhinoplasty procedures; plastic surgeons performed 1438 (78.2%) cases and otolaryngologists performed 401 (21.8%) cases. After analyzing each group, no significant differences were noted in terms of wound dehiscence, surgical site infection, readmission, or reoperation. Subgroup analysis revealed that plastic surgeons prefer using rib and ear cartilage, while otolaryngologists prefer septal and ear cartilage.The analysis of 1839 pediatric patients undergoing three types of rhinoplasty procedures showed similar postoperative outcomes, but different cartilage graft utilization between plastic surgeons and otolaryngologists.

Publicly Reported Patient Satisfaction Scores in Academic Otolaryngology Departments.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: Despite controversy regarding their impact and validity, there is a rising national focus on patient satisfaction scores (PSS). We describe the landscape of online PSS as posted by academic otolaryngology practices. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cross-sectional study. METHODS: Websites of academic otolaryngology programs were reviewed for PSS scores, provider type, and geographic location. Gender was determined by picture or profile pronouns. Years of experience were determined by year of initial American Board of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery certification. We defined PSS derived from Press-Ganey or Clinician and Group Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems surveys as "standardized PSS". We determined potential associations between provider characteristics and standardized PSS. RESULTS: Out of 115 Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery academic programs, 40 (35%) posted a total of 64,638 online PSS surveys (nonstandardized plus standardized) of 507 unique otolaryngology care providers. Standardized PSS were posted for 473 providers (370 [78%] male; 446 physicians; 27 advanced practice providers). Median overall standardized PSS was 4.8 (interquartile range 4.7-4.9; range 3.8-5.0). PSS were similar between gender, provider type, and years of experience. Male providers had more surveys than female providers (149 vs. 93; P < .01). There was a linear relationship between number of surveys and years of experience (P < .01), but no relationship between number of surveys and overall standardized PSS. CONCLUSIONS: Patient satisfaction with otolaryngology providers at academic institutions is consistently high, as demonstrated by high online PSS with little variability. The limited variation in PSS may limit their usefulness in differentiating providers and quality of care. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:2204-2210, 2021.

Opioid prescribing practices in academic otolaryngology: A single institutional survey.

OBJECTIVES: Opioids are highly addictive medications and otolaryngologists have a responsibility to practice opioid stewardship. We investigated postoperative opioid prescribing patterns among resident and attending physicians as an educational platform to underscore the importance of conscientious opioid prescribing. METHODS: This quality improvement study was designed as a cross-sectional electronic survey. Residents and attending clinical faculty members at a single academic institution were queried from February through April 2020. An electronic survey was distributed to capture postoperative opioid prescribing patterns after common procedures. At the conclusion of the study, results were sent to all faculty and residents. RESULTS: A total of 29 attending otolaryngologists and 22 residents completed the survey. Resident physicians prescribed on average fewer postoperative opioid pills than attendings. Among attendings, the largest number of opioids were prescribed following tonsillectomy (dose varied by patient age), neck dissection (12.6 pills), brow lift (13.3 pills), facelift (13.3 pills), and open reduction of facial trauma (10.7 pills). For residents, surgeries with the most postoperatively prescribed opioids were for tonsillectomy (varied by patient age), neck dissection (13.4 pills), open reduction of facial trauma (10.5 pills), parotidectomy (10.0 pills), and thyroid/parathyroidectomy (9.0 pills). The largest volume of postoperative opioids for both groups was prescribed following tonsillectomy. Attendings prescribed significantly more opioids after facelift and brow lift than did residents (p = 0.01 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSION: There was good concordance between resident and attending prescribers. Improvement in opioid prescribing and pain management should be an essential component of otolaryngology residency education and attending continuing medical education. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.

Predictors of Quality-of-Life Improvements Following Global Head and Neck Surgery Trips to Underserved Regions.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To conduct longitudinal postoperative follow-up and discern health-related quality-of-life (HR-QoL) changes using a validated questionnaire among patients undergoing head and neck surgeries during a short-term, global surgical trip in a resource-limited setting. To identify clinicodemographic predictors of post-operative HR-QoL improvements in this setting. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational study with prospective follow-up. METHODS: Patients undergoing surgery at Moi Teaching and Referral Hospital in Eldoret, Kenya through the authors' short-term surgical trip (STST) between 2016 and 2019 were asked to complete preoperative Short Form-36 (SF-36) HR-QoL questionnaires, and postoperative SF-36 questionnaires during subsequent follow-up. Preoperative and postoperative SF-36 domain scores, and two composite scores (mental component summary [MCS] and physical component summary [PCS]) were compared. Linear regression models were fit to identify clinicodemographic factors predictors of general health (GH), MCS, and PCS scores. RESULTS: Among the 26 participating patients, significant improvements were seen in post-operative GH (mean change = 19.8) and MCS (mean change = 11.2) scores. Lower pre-operative GH, MCS, and PCS scores were predictive of greater improvement in the corresponding post-operative scores. Longer time to follow-up was associated with greater improvement in GH score. Mean follow-up interval was 23.1 months (SD = 1.8 months). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing the SF-36 questionnaire, we found that patients' perception of their general and psychosocial health improved after undergoing head and neck surgeries through a global STST. This study provides important, preliminary evidence that that elective surgeries performed in low-resource settings convey substantial benefit to patient QoL. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:2006-2010, 2021.

Online Ratings and Perceptions of Pediatric Otolaryngologists.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess and characterize online ratings and comments on pediatric otolaryngologists and determine factors that correlate with higher ratings. STUDY DESIGN: Online database analysis. METHODS: All American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) members were queried on Healthgrades, Vitals, RateMDs, and Yelp for their online ratings and comments as of June 2020. Ratings were normalized for comparison on a five-point Likert scale. All comments were categorized based on context and positive or negative quality. RESULTS: Of the 561 ASPO members, 489 (87%) were rated on at least one online platform. Of those rated, 410 (84%) were on Healthgrades, 429 (88%) on Vitals, 236 (48%) on RateMDs, and 72 (15%) on Yelp. Across all platforms, the average overall rating was 4.13 ± 0.03 (range, 1.00-5.00). We found significant positive correlations between overall ratings and specific ratings (P < .001) on all individual topics. In addition, the majority of all narrative comments were related to perceived physician bedside manner and clinical outcome, with negative comments correlating negatively with overall score (P < .05). Time spent with the physician was the only category in which both positive and negative comments showed significant correlation with the overall physician rating (P = .016 and P = .017, respectively). Attending a top-ranked medical school or residency program did not correlate with higher or lower ratings. CONCLUSIONS: Online ratings and comments for pediatric otolaryngologists are largely influenced by patient and parent perceptions of physician competence, comforting bedside manner, and office and time management. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:2356-2360, 2021.

Advanced Practice Provider Clinics: Expediting Care For Children Undergoing Tympanostomy Tube Placement.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: Advanced practice provider (APP) employment is becoming common in pediatric otolaryngology practices, though few studies have evaluated the consequences that APP-led clinics have on access to care. The objectives of this study were: 1) to investigate whether access to bilateral myringotomy with tympanostomy tube placement (BMT) for recurrent acute otitis media (RAOM) differed between patients seen in otolaryngologist and APP-led clinics 2) to compare clinical characteristics of patients seen by provider type. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study at an academic, tertiary care pediatric otolaryngology practice. All children were <18 years old and underwent evaluation for RAOM followed by BMT. We compared time in days from scheduling pre-operative appointment to appointment date and time from appointment to BMT between patients seen by APPs and otolaryngologists using Mann-Whitney U tests and multivariate linear regression models. We compared clinical characteristics by provider type using Mann-Whitney U tests and Fisher exact tests. RESULTS: A total of 957 children were included. Children seen by APPs had significantly shorter wait times for appointments (median 19 vs. 39 days, P < .001) and shorter times from preoperative appointment to BMT (median 25 vs. 37 days, P < .001). Patients seen by otolaryngologists had increased prevalence of craniofacial abnormalities, Down Syndrome, hearing loss, history of otologic surgery, and higher ASA physical status classification. CONCLUSIONS: Children seen by APPs received care more quickly than those seen by otolaryngologists. Patients seen by otolaryngologists tended to be more medically complex. Implementation of independent APP clinics may expedite and improve access to BMT for children with RAOM. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:2133-2140, 2021.

Cleft Palate Repair by Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons: Risk Factors for Postoperative Fistula.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To assess the incidence of palatal fistula after primary repair of the cleft palate among two cohorts of Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons and to identify patient and surgeon characteristics that may predict fistula development. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case series with chart review. METHODS: Children who underwent primary repair of cleft palate at one of two multidisciplinary cleft centers over a 10 year period were identified. Charts were reviewed for the presence of palatal fistula; chi square test and multivariate logistic regression analysis were performed to determine variables associated with fistula formation. RESULTS: From 2007 to 2017, 477 patients underwent primary repair of cleft palate by one of 6 Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons. Twenty-four children had incomplete charts, allowing 453 patients to be included in the final analysis. The pooled mean incidence of palatal fistula was 6.6% (P = .525) and varied significantly by cleft type. Logistic regression analysis controlling for multiple variables, showed that Veau IV classification had the highest risk of fistula (OR = 10.582; P = .004). Repair by a specific surgeon was not a significant risk factor for fistula development (P > .07 for each surgeon). CONCLUSIONS: Among six Otolaryngologist-Head and Neck Surgeons with fellowship training in cleft palate repair postoperative fistula rates were consistent and compared favorably to standards in the Cleft and Craniofacial surgery literature established by other surgical specialties. Consistent with larger database studies involving multiple surgical specialties, Veau IV classification was the strongest predictor of palatal fistula development, even after adjusting for multiple variables, including differing levels of experience. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:1281-1285, 2021.

Current Status and Future Trends: Pediatric Intracapsular Tonsillectomy in the United States.

OBJECTIVES: 1) To assess the current status of pediatric intracapsular tonsillectomy in the United States, and 2) To apply lessons from the scientific literature and adoption of surgical innovation to predict future trends in pediatric intracapsular tonsillectomy. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional survey study and literature review. An anonymous survey was sent to all members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) to determine current practices in pediatric tonsillectomy. Statistical analysis was performed to compare differences in individuals who perform intracapsular tonsillectomy as opposed to extracapsular tonsillectomy. A literature analysis of the adoption of new technological advancements and innovative surgical techniques was then performed. RESULTS: The survey was sent to 540 pediatric otolaryngologists with a response rate of 42%. Of all respondents, 20% currently perform intracapsular tonsillectomy. The primary reason cited for not performing the procedure was concern for tonsillar regrowth. Time in practice, practice setting, and fellowship status was not associated with an increased incidence of intracapsular tonsillectomy. CONCLUSIONS: Only 20% of pediatric otolaryngologist respondents in the United States perform intracapsular tonsillectomy. Based on the documented advantages of intracapsular tonsillectomy over extracapsular tonsillectomy and an analysis of adoption of novel surgical techniques, we predict a paradigm shift in the specialty toward intracapsular tonsillectomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:S1-S9, 2021.

Financial Transactions from Manufacturers to Otolaryngologists in 2018.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize in depth non-research and research payments from industry to otolaryngologists in 2018 with an emphasis on product types. METHODS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments program was used for data collection: payment amount, the nature of payments, products associated with the payments, date of the payments, and companies making the payments were studied. Products associated with the payments were classified by categorical type. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: There were 70,172 payments for a total of $11,001,875 made to otolaryngologists in 2018 with a median payment of $19. Food and beverage had the highest number of payments made (89.96%). Consulting fees (33.46%) composed the highest total payment amount. The two companies that contributed the highest amount were Stryker Corporation and Intersect ENT Inc. Sinus conditions had the most products within the top 25 products associated with payments. The top five products with the highest payments received were for balloon sinus dilation, nasal spray, sinus implant, Botox, and cochlear implant. There was a bimodal payment distribution demonstrating a higher number of payments made in the spring and fall. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to review payments to otolaryngologists in 2018 and classify these payments into product types. The products and companies that contributed the highest payments were associated with sinus conditions. The products that dominated in each subspecialty of otolaryngology coincide with clinical practice trends and emerging technologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E388-E394, 2021.

Factors Associated With Distribution of Female Otolaryngology Residents in United States.

OBJECTIVE: The gender balance within medicine, and specifically within otolaryngology, is equalizing. It is important to determine the factors that impact the distribution of female residents among otolaryngology programs in the United States to better understand factors that may affect these changing trends. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective Study. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis was performed using data from 2018 of otolaryngology residents at 90 programs across the United States. Each program's website was searched for a current resident roster. Data of geography, number of female faculty, number of female physicians in leadership positions, program setting, and program size were obtained. Statistical comparison of these factors with number of female residents was performed with P < .05 as significant. RESULTS: There was a significant association between programs having a higher-than-average female faculty representation and a greater representation of female residents (P < .001). Larger residency programs were more likely to have greater female representation (P = .010). There was a slight predominance of both female residents and female faculty at urban programs (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, P = .04; OR = 1.28, P = .03). Geographic location, presence of a female chairperson, and presence of a female residency program director were not associated with higher female-to-male resident ratio. CONCLUSION: Availability of female role models in faculty, along with program setting and size, may be more likely to promote greater female representation. Focusing on gender equality in the workplace can help promote diversity in the workforce and improve patient outcomes. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: NA Laryngoscope, 131:E367-E372, 2021.

Why Otolaryngologists Get Excluded From Medicare and Medicaid.

The List of Excluded Individuals and Entities (LEIE) is a federally updated and available list of providers who have been excluded from participating from federal healthcare programs. With over 40 year's worth of exclusion history, we were able to isolate and identify otolaryngologists who were excluded and the most common cause, albeit exceptionally rare, was revocation of their medical license due to negligence.

National Trends in Daily Ambulatory Electronic Health Record Use by Otolaryngologists.

OBJECTIVE: Since their development in the 1970s electronic health records (EHRs) are now nearly ubiquitous. This study aims to characterize the daily interactions of otolaryngology providers with EHRs. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional review of provider efficiency profile (PEP) data, as collected by a major EHR vendor. Participating institutions had 6 months of de-identified PEP data reviewed starting January 1, 2019. PEP data is generated for providers with scheduled patients, both attendings and advanced practice providers (APPs). Time metrics are recorded when a provider is interacting with the EHR including a 5-second time-out for inactivity. RESULTS: Data on 269 otolaryngologists and 29 APPs from 10 institutions were evaluated. On scheduled ambulatory clinic days attendings spent 70 ± 36 (mean ± standard deviation) min interacting in the EHR versus 108 ± 46 min for APPs. Of the daily EHR time, mean time in notes, clinical review, in basket, orders, and schedule were 30.1 ± 19.4, 9.6 ± 6.1, 7.3 ± 5.8, and 5.8 ± 7.6 min, respectively. Per patient visit, median (interquartile range) time in notes, clinical review, and orders were 3.19 (2.2-4.9), 1.14 (0.63-1.8), and 0.70 (0.47-1.05) min, respectively. Mean progress note length was 4638 ± 2143 characters. CONCLUSION: Otolaryngology providers spend a meaningful portion of their clinic day interacting with the EHR. PEP data may provide means to target interventions and a metric to measure the impact of those interventions on provider EHR efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:975-981, 2021.

Gender-Based Pay Discrimination in Otolaryngology.

Male and female otolaryngologists all attend the same accredited medical schools, complete the same accredited residency programs, and take the same board certification exams; however, female otolaryngologist are paid 77 cents on the dollar compared to their male colleagues. Even after accounting for age, experience, faculty rank, research productivity, and clinical revenue, significant gender pay gaps exist across all professor levels. The goal of this review is to improve our understanding of how and why the gender pay gap and discrimination exists, the harm caused by tolerance of policies that perpetuate gender pay inequity, and what is and can be done to correct gender-based pay gaps and discrimination. The review presents the current status of gender pay inequity in the United States and reports on how otolaryngology compares to other professions both within and outside of healthcare. The gender pay gap is shown to have a negative impact on economic growth, institutional reputation and financial success, retention and recruitment of faculty, and patient care. Many historically incorrect reasons used to explain the causes of the gender pay gap, including that women work less, have less research productivity, or produce lower-quality care, have been be disproved by evaluation of current research. Potential causes of gender pay inequities, such as gender bias, organization culture, fear of retaliation, promotions inequalities, lack of transparency, and senior leadership not being held accountable for equity and diversity concerns, will be explored. Finally, examples of best practices to achieve pay equity will be presented. Laryngoscope, 131:989-995, 2021.

Digital Otoscopy Videos Versus Composite Images: A Reader Study to Compare the Accuracy of ENT Physicians.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: With the increasing emphasis on developing effective telemedicine approaches in Otolaryngology, this study explored whether a single composite image stitched from a digital otoscopy video provides acceptable diagnostic information to make an accurate diagnosis, as compared with that provided by the full video. STUDY DESIGN: Diagnostic survey analysis. METHODS: Five Ear, Nose, and Throat (ENT) physicians reviewed the same set of 78 digital otoscope eardrum videos from four eardrum conditions: normal, effusion, retraction, and tympanosclerosis, along with the composite images generated by a SelectStitch method that selectively uses video frames with computer-assisted selection, as well as a Stitch method that incorporates all the video frames. Participants provided a diagnosis for each item along with a rating of diagnostic confidence. Diagnostic accuracy for each pathology of SelectStitch was compared with accuracy when reviewing the entire video clip and when reviewing the Stitch image. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in diagnostic accuracy for physicians reviewing SelectStitch images and full video clips, but both provided better diagnostic accuracy than Stitch images. The inter-reader agreement was moderate. CONCLUSIONS: Equal to using full video clips, composite images of eardrums generated by SelectStitch provided sufficient information for ENTs to make the correct diagnoses for most pathologies. These findings suggest that use of a composite eardrum image may be sufficient for telemedicine approaches to ear diagnosis, eliminating the need for storage and transmission of large video files, along with future applications for improved documentation in electronic medical record systems, patient/family counseling, and clinical training. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:E1668-E1676, 2021.

Management of Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Around the World: An International Study.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate worldwide practices of otolaryngologists in the management of laryngopharyngeal reflux (LPR). METHODS: An online survey was sent on the management of LPR to members of many otolaryngological societies. The following aspects were evaluated: LPR definition, prevalence, clinical presentation, diagnosis, and treatment. RESULTS: A total of 824 otolaryngologists participated, spread over 65 countries. The symptoms most usually attributed to LPR are cough after lying down/meal, throat clearing and globus sensation while LPR-related findings are arytenoid erythema and posterior commissure hypertrophy. Irrespective to geography, otolaryngologists indicate lack of familiarity with impedance pH monitoring, which they attribute to lack of knowledge in result interpretation. The most common therapeutic regimens significantly vary between world regions, with a higher use of H2 blocker in North America and a lower use of alginate in South America. The duration of treatment also significantly varies between different regions, with West Asia/Africa and East Asia/Oceania otolaryngologists prescribing medication for a shorter period than the others. Only 21.1% of respondents are aware about the existence of nonacid LPR. Overall, only 43.2% of otolaryngologists believe themselves sufficiently knowledgeable about LPR. CONCLUSIONS: LPR knowledge and management significantly vary across the world. International guidelines on LPR definition, diagnosis, and treatment are needed to improve knowledge and management around the world. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N.A. Laryngoscope, 131:E1589-E1597, 2021.

A Dizzying Complaint: Investigating the Intended Meaning of Dizziness Among Patients and Providers.

OBJECTIVE/HYPOTHESIS: To assess for semantic differences regarding the definition of dizziness among otolaryngology patients, otolaryngologists, and non-otolaryngologist providers. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Between March and May 2020, a survey consisting of 20 common descriptors for dizziness within five domains (lightheadedness, motion sensitivity, imbalance, vision complaints, and pain) was completed by patients at two outpatient otolaryngology clinics. Surveys were subsequently obtained from otolaryngology and non-otolaryngology providers attending a multidisciplinary dizziness lecture. The primary outcome measure was to assess for differences in definition of dizziness between patients and providers. Secondary outcome measures included assessing differences between otolaryngologists and non-otolaryngologists. RESULTS: About 221 patients and 100 providers participated. Patients selected a median of 7 terms compared to 8 for providers (P = .375), although providers had a larger overall distribution of number of terms selected (P = .038). Patients were more likely than providers to define dizziness according to the following domains: lightheadedness (difference 15.0%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5%-25.3%), vision complaints (difference 21.6%, 95% CI 12.0%-29.6%), and pain (difference 11.5%, 95% CI 4.7%-17.1%). Providers were more likely to define dizziness according to the motion sensitivity domain (difference 13.8%, 95% CI 6.8%-19.6%). Otolaryngology and non-otolaryngology providers defined dizziness similarly across symptom domains. CONCLUSION: Although patients and providers both view dizziness as imbalance, patients more commonly describe dizziness in the context of lightheadedness, vision complaints, and pain, whereas providers more frequently define dizziness according to motion sensitivity. These semantic differences create an additional barrier to effective patient-provider communication. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 131:E1443-E1449, 2021.

Adoption of Active Surveillance for Very Low-Risk Differentiated Thyroid Cancer in the United States: A National Survey.

CONTEXT: Active surveillance (AS) of thyroid cancer with serial ultrasounds is a newer management option in the United States. OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to understand factors associated with the adoption of AS. METHODS: We surveyed endocrinologists and surgeons in the American Medical Association Masterfile. To estimate adoption, respondents recommended treatment for 2 hypothetical cases appropriate for AS. Established models of guideline implementation guided questionnaire development. Outcome measures included adoption of AS (nonadopters vs adopters, who respectively did not recommend or recommended AS at least once; and partial vs full adopters, who respectively recommended AS for one or both cases). RESULTS: The 464 respondents (33.3% response) demographically represented specialties that treat thyroid cancer. Nonadopters (45.7%) were significantly (P < .001) less likely than adopters to practice in academic settings, see more than 25 thyroid cancer patients/year, be aware of AS, use applicable guidelines (P = .04), know how to determine whether a patient is appropriate for AS, have resources to perform AS, or be motivated to use AS. Nonadopters were also significantly more likely to be anxious or have reservations about AS, be concerned about poor outcomes, or believe AS places a psychological burden on patients. Among adopters, partial and full adopters were similar except partial adopters were less likely to discuss AS with patients (P = .03) and more likely to be anxious (P = .04), have reservations (P = .03), and have concerns about the psychological burden (P = .009) of AS. Few respondents (3.2%) believed patients were aware of AS. CONCLUSION: Widespread adoption of AS will require increased patient and physician awareness, interest, and evaluation of outcomes.

Sleep medicine in otolaryngology units: an international survey.

PURPOSE: No study to date has described the overall landscape of sleep disorders management and training in otolaryngology departments of different countries. The aim of our study was to investigate and compare settings, diagnostic and therapeutic approaches and training programmes. METHODS: An international online survey was developed with the collaboration of the YO-IFOS (Young Otolaryngologists-International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies) to assess the current practice of otolaryngologists in the management of sleep disorders. The survey also included a session dedicated to training. RESULTS: A total of 126 otolaryngologists completed the survey. The larger part of responses was collected from Central/South America and Europe. The majority of responders from South/Central America (97%) declared to be certified as sleep specialist while 49% of Europeans stated the opposite. Of responders 83% perform a drug-induced sleep endoscopy (DISE) before planning a possible surgical intervention. Soft palate and base of tongue interventions were the most common procedure, respectively performed in 94% and 79% of the cases. Residents were allowed to perform soft palate surgery in 77% of the cases. Upper airway stimulation (26% vs 10%), trans-oral robotic surgery (36% vs 11%) and radiofrequency of the base of the tongue (58% vs 25%) were preferred more frequently by European responders. The highest caseloads of soft palate surgery and bi-maxillary advancement were registered in the academic institutions. CONCLUSION: Significant concordance and few interesting divergences in diagnosis and treatment of sleep disorders were observed between nationalities and types of institution. Economic resources might have played a significant role in the therapeutic choice. Trainees' lack of exposure to certain interventions and to a sufficient caseload appeared to be the main burden to overcome.

The impact of surgeon volume on total thyroidectomy outcomes among otolaryngologists.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the impact of surgeon volume on total thyroidectomy complications and outcomes among otolaryngologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This state-wide, multi-hospital retrospective review identified patients who underwent total thyroidectomy (TT) (ICD9-06.4) through the Statewide Planning and Research Cooperative System (SPARCS) between 1995 and 2015. Surgeons were categorized into high (>100), medium (10-99), and low (<10) volume groups and differences in complication rates were analyzed. Statistical analysis employed Spearman's rank correlation, Kruskal-Wallis testing, and chi-squared testing. RESULTS: 32,133 TT performed by 1032 otolaryngologists were identified. Overall complication rate in our cohort was 9.83% (CI: 9.48-10.18). The most common complication identified overall was hypocalcemia occurring in 3.85% of cases. Surgeons in the high volume group had a complication rate of 9.6%, compared to 10.0% and 11.6% in the medium and low volume groups. This represents a moderate, but statistically significant difference (rho: -0.4, p < 0.0001; KW p ≤0.0001). When looking at individual complications, temporary tracheostomy rate was higher in the low volume group (5.1%, p = 0.001). Other variables such as advanced age, sex, non-white race, or thyroid malignancy were not predictors of increased complication rates for TT. CONCLUSIONS: Otolaryngologists who perform a high volume of total thyroidectomy were found to have overall less perioperative complications than those with less volume. In particular, the risk of temporary tracheostomy is higher among low volume surgeons. These findings are consistent with previous studies of the effect of thyroidectomy volume on surgical complications.